![]() This will tell the Synology to block the creation of any new. Under “Veto criteria” enter “/.DS_Store/”. About half way down on this page you will see an option for “Veto files”. Now click on Advanced Settings under SMB. Open the web interface of your Synology NAS and then open the Control Panel application. It’s a simple way to block or hide files on your shares. Samba supports a mechanism called “Veto Files” and Synology supports this in DSM. DS_Store files deleted, it’s time to put in place a mechanism on the Synology to prevent them from returning. Del with this switches will force a deletion without asking and search all subfolders for the files. This simply changes to the directory of your mapped share (change D:\ to your drive letter). DS_Store files from a PC running Windows, you can map the share and run the following commands: You can also SSH into your Synology NAS and run this command at the command line if you know the location of the share within your volumes and have SSH enabled. This uses the find command to search the shared folder and actions it with the delete option to remove it. DS_Store files from MacOS or Linux, you can attach the share and run the following command:įind /YourShareName -name ".DS_Store" -delete The first thing we need to do is delete all of the existing. You may want to consider disabling all user access to the Synology during this time period and just tell your users you’re going to be doing maintenance for a bit. You will most likely have to restart the SMB service on your Synology NAS which will cause a blip to user access.When we block them, files that get created during this process will become sort of ghost files that will haunt you later on when deleting directories.DS_Store files as your deleting them, that’s an effort in futility. DS_Store Files on a Synology NASĪlright, before we begin, I highly recommend that you do this during a time of low usage by your user community. ![]() I’ll also show you how to clean up these existing. DS_Store files on a Synology NAS permanently, and also show you how to make your Macs be better citizens on the network too. So in this tutorial I am going to show you how to block. This is fine if your entire network is made up of Macs, but for those with PCs it clutters up your shares everywhere and is super irritating. Such as sort order, position and size of icons, and even a custom background file for this folder. These files are used by MacOS to store custom attributes about a folder layout. At the moment I am using both for backup, but I want to stick with just one to save space.īut which advantages or disadvantages do I overlook here? Maybe compression is better with one of them? Transfer speeds? Possibilities to restore the whole system with TimeMachine? Files/Folders that are backup'd (implicitely) with TimeMachine that I might forget to forget with Drive? TimeMachine eventually implicitely knows which files/folders do not need to be backup'd like caches, thumbnails, etc.If you’re like most system administrators who have a mixed Windows, Linux, and Mac environment it probably drives you mad (and your users too) that there are these “.DS_Store” files all over your network shares. So to me Drive seems actually the better approach. Another advantage: With Drive my backups from my Windows machine, Linux and Mac work all the same, the target folders on the NAS are in the same place next to each other, I know where to find stuff and it is all within the NAS user folder in contrast to the TimeMachine backup for which you have to jump through some hoops and create a separate share making permissions more difficult to adjust for multiple users. Those backup'd files will be accessible from other devices and OSes as well (If I need to access such file from Windows/Linux/Android). It has several advantages: The backup can be continuous so it backups each version of a file not only on an hourly or daily basis. On the other hand Synology Drive can be used to backup files and folder to the NAS. Opinions? Advantages of TimeMachine: It is perfectly integrated into MacOs. I should probably do a versioned backup but that seemed kind of overkill back then. HyperBackup is creating a daily copy of this TimeMachine backup, but if it is corrupt, then this copy might be useless as well. ![]() I had to create new ones and basically lost the history. Unfortunately it occured already twice that this backup somewhat got corrupted in a way that I could not continue to use it. In the beginning I used TimeMachine to backup my Macbook to a Synology NAS. I need to hear some opinions and maybe some advantages and disadvantages that I did not think of yet.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |